<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://q.quora.com/_/ad/5563d0311fad46359c6ac4019b758ba3/pixel?tag=ViewContent&amp;noscript=1">

Overview: Turntable-based 3D Body Scanners


Turntable-based 3D body scanners rely on the same technology as handheld 3D scanners (structured light), however they typically use less expensive hardware such as a Microsoft Kinect, Primesense, Asus Xtion, or Intel Realsense sensor to calculate depth.

Average Cost:

$5,000 to $10,000

How it works:

Turntable based 3D body scanners were created to eliminate the need for a human being to walk around and scan people with a handheld 3D scanenr. The subject steps onto a platform and holds still while the platform rotates and a mounted 3D sensor moves up and down until the entire person completes their 3D body scan. The 3D scanning process normally takes 1-2 minutes and the processing time is similar to a handheld 3D scanner of 2-3 minutes.


The limitations are the same as they are for handheld 3D scanners. They struggle with scanning transparent (ex/ lenses on glasses) or reflective surfaces (ex/ shiny car parts) and require that the subject being scanned stands perfectly still.

Post production:

The post production process is very similar to touching up a scan from a handheld 3D scanner, however, 3D models from a turntable-based 3D body scanner are of lower quality than those from a handheld 3D scanner because of the cheaper, off the shelf, 3D sensor (this will be discussed further in the pros and cons section). One interesting advantage of using lower quality 3D sensors is because the resulting geometries are coarser, they are also typically more complete and thus require less touch-up time to make the model 3D printable. Unfortunately these coarser geometries do not have the same geometry detail so to add that geometry detail back, if desired, can take a 3D artist many hours. If the person moved during their scan the same problems result as with handheld scanners and it often makes sense to rescan the individual instead of trying to fix problems in post production. For lighting, many people mount LED strips to the system if they are not already integrated. This makes for far better lighting than otherwise but can still cause texture problems which need to be fixed in the touch-up. If you were to have a professional 3D artist do the post production work for you, you should expect to pay $15-$25 per 3D scan to get it ready for full color 3D printing.


  • Portability - While not as portable as a handheld 3D scanner, setup is fairly straightforward. A normal setup time is 20-30 minutes.
  • Scan processing time - Like a handheld 3D scanner, a turntable-based 3D scanner uses structured light to calculate depth. The time to a full 3D model is 2-3 minutes.
  • Low cost - At only a few thousand dollars, it is a very affordable option.


  • 3D scan quality - The sensors used in turntable-based 3D full body scanners (Microsoft Kinect, Primesense, Asus Xtion, or Intel Realsense) are not capable of capturing the same texture resolution or geometry detail as most handheld 3D scanners. For the texture, the lower quality is because the integrated camera can only capture pictures at a 640 x 480 resolution which limits the sharpness and level of detail significantly.  
  • Subjects need to be still for 2-3 minutes .. while they spin in a circle - Just like in handheld 3D scanners, turntable-based 3D scanners require people to be as still as possible to ensure you get good enough geometry data. Many turntable-based 3D scanner owners will often scan people 2-3 times to get a usable 3D scan as movement by the subject is very common. As you can imagine, this makes for a very poor customer experience.


Turntable based 3D scanners were the first body scanners introduced specifically for the 3D photography market. They solved the hassle of manually scanning a subject inherent with handheld scanners and they also solved the high cost barrier inherent with handheld scanning and DSLR based systems by using cheaper, off the shelf, 3D sensors, however, they are not well suited for scanning children, pets and adults incapable of standing still (the Twinstant 3D body scanner does a really good job with kids, pets etc). Turntable systems may continue to persist as the lowest cost option to serve the low end of the market or they may disappear altogether.

Request Free 3D Photography Industry Guide